Connect Business Solutions Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs

Decision date: 3 May 2011

Neutral citation: [2011] UKFTT 281 (TC)

Overall AI summary confidence: high

AI Notice: Any short overview, ratio decidendi summary or obiter dicta summary shown on this page is AI-generated, provided only to help users assess potential relevance more quickly, and may be wholly inaccurate. No liability is accepted for the accuracy of any such summary, regardless of any AI confidence rating shown. Users should check the underlying decision and obtain appropriate legal advice rather than relying on any summary.

Short overview

This short overview is intended to summarise the case, issues and outcome so far as they are supported by the judgment.

AI confidence in this short overview: high

Connect Business Solutions failed to file its 2007–08 P35 by the statutory deadline and HMRC imposed two late-filing penalties totalling £1,200. The First-tier Tribunal found the return was not filed on time, rejected Connect's asserted reasonable excuse (including non-receipt of HMRC letters and belief that an online filing had been made) and dismissed the appeal, confirming the penalties.

Ratio decidendi

This summary is intended to identify the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal reasons for deciding and the binding part of the decision.

AI confidence in this ratio decidendi summary: high

The Tribunal held that a taxpayer who normally files online should expect an on-screen confirmation of successful submission, and the absence of such confirmation should have alerted the filer that the return was not submitted; accordingly non-receipt of HMRC correspondence or delay in HMRC recovery action does not by itself constitute a reasonable excuse for late filing.

Obiter dicta

This summary is intended to identify obiter dicta, meaning observations made by the way that were not necessary to deciding the case and are not binding.

AI confidence in this obiter dicta summary: medium

The Tribunal indicated that a request for full written reasons is permissible where a summary decision was given, and a judge need only set out findings and reasons sufficient for the parties and an appeal court to understand the decision rather than address every argument in detail. It also noted that the assessment of what amounts to a "reasonable excuse" depends on the particular circumstances of the case.