Melton Mowbray Conservative Club v The Commissioners for HMRC

Decision date: 19 December 2025

Neutral citation: [2025] UKFTT 1608 (TC)

Overall AI summary confidence: high

AI Notice: Any short overview, ratio decidendi summary or obiter dicta summary shown on this page is AI-generated, provided only to help users assess potential relevance more quickly, and may be wholly inaccurate. No liability is accepted for the accuracy of any such summary, regardless of any AI confidence rating shown. Users should check the underlying decision and obtain appropriate legal advice rather than relying on any summary.

Short overview

This short overview is intended to summarise the case, issues and outcome so far as they are supported by the judgment.

AI confidence in this short overview: high

This First-tier Tribunal heard HMRC’s application to strike out VAT repayment appeals by Melton Mowbray Conservative Club and found the Club had overpaid VAT and was entitled to repayment. The Tribunal held a Deed of Appointment pursuant to the Club’s trust rules and the Trustee Act vested the benefit of the VAT claims in the new trustees (including the Association of Conservative Clubs Ltd), HMRC’s strike-out application was refused, and HMRC was directed to repay the agreed sums with statutory interest to the New Trustees/Association.

Ratio decidendi

This summary is intended to identify the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal reasons for deciding and the binding part of the decision.

AI confidence in this ratio decidendi summary: high

A deed appointing new trustees under the trust’s rules and the Trustee Act can operate at law to vest the benefit of a claim in the new trustees without a separate formal transfer, and a third party such as HMRC may rely on such an instrument as conclusive proof of entitlement when making repayment.

Obiter dicta

This summary is intended to identify obiter dicta, meaning observations made by the way that were not necessary to deciding the case and are not binding.

AI confidence in this obiter dicta summary: medium

The Tribunal suggested that strict adherence by a revenue authority to non-statutory internal guidance is unnecessary where the statutory trust provisions and a deed plainly effect transfer; it also observed that where a trust has no remaining members trustees may direct payment into a trustee bank account to further the trust’s objects.