9 Up Consultant Limited v The Commissioners for HMRC
Decision date: 4 March 2024
Neutral citation: [2024] UKFTT 365 (TC)
Overall AI summary confidence: high
Short overview
This short overview is intended to summarise the case, issues and outcome so far as they are supported by the judgment.
AI confidence in this short overview: high
9 Up Consultant Ltd appealed HMRC’s refusal to allow £1,754.75 input VAT claimed in its first return. The tribunal found the supplied documents did not meet the invoice particulars required by Regulation 14 VATR 1995, the appellant had not sought corrected invoices from suppliers, and HMRC’s decision to deny the input tax was a lawful exercise of discretion. The appeal was dismissed.
Ratio decidendi
This summary is intended to identify the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal reasons for deciding and the binding part of the decision.
AI confidence in this ratio decidendi summary: high
The decision rests on the principle that a claimant must hold invoices containing the particulars specified in Regulation 14 VATR 1995 to support an input tax claim, or otherwise persuade HMRC under the discretion in Regulation 29(2); where required invoice particulars are absent and the taxpayer has not sought corrected invoices from suppliers, HMRC’s refusal to allow the input tax can be upheld as a reasonable exercise of discretion.
Obiter dicta
This summary is intended to identify obiter dicta, meaning observations made by the way that were not necessary to deciding the case and are not binding.
AI confidence in this obiter dicta summary: medium
The tribunal noted HMRC guidance (VAT Notice 700 Part 16) expects taxpayers with invalid invoices to request corrected invoices from suppliers and to evidence why that cannot be done, and that unsupported assertions that suppliers refuse to provide proper invoices to conceal grey-market trading do not excuse compliance with Regulation 14 requirements.
Warning
Chunk contains substantial duplication and some typographical/repetition errors which made reading repetitive but did not alter core findings.