Marisa Lincoln v The Commissioners for HMRC

Decision date: 4 October 2024

Neutral citation: [2024] UKFTT 886 (TC)

Overall AI summary confidence: high

AI Notice: Any short overview, ratio decidendi summary or obiter dicta summary shown on this page is AI-generated, provided only to help users assess potential relevance more quickly, and may be wholly inaccurate. No liability is accepted for the accuracy of any such summary, regardless of any AI confidence rating shown. Users should check the underlying decision and obtain appropriate legal advice rather than relying on any summary.

Short overview

This short overview is intended to summarise the case, issues and outcome so far as they are supported by the judgment.

AI confidence in this short overview: high

This appeal by the executrix of Martin Falzon challenged HMRC’s IHT determination that his 1/6 undivided share of Maltese immovable property formed part of his estate. The Tribunal treated an earlier unappealed determination that Martin was deemed domiciled in the UK as conclusive, found he had beneficial entitlement to the Maltese properties, held they were not settled or excluded property (nor reversionary interests immediately before death), and dismissed the appeal.

Ratio decidendi

This summary is intended to identify the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal reasons for deciding and the binding part of the decision.

AI confidence in this ratio decidendi summary: medium

The Tribunal applied the earlier unappealed statutory determination as binding in the subsequent IHT proceedings between the same parties; it also applied ordinary principles of beneficial entitlement to conclude an undivided foreign co-heir’s share can form part of the deceased’s estate for IHT where the deceased had beneficial use or benefit, and held that the mere potential operation of English trust principles does not by itself satisfy the statutory definition of a "settlement" for exclusion under the IHTA.

Obiter dicta

This summary is intended to identify obiter dicta, meaning observations made by the way that were not necessary to deciding the case and are not binding.

AI confidence in this obiter dicta summary: medium

The Tribunal warned against admitting late evidence and arguments that exceeded case directions, stressing the need to balance flexibility for litigants in person with finality and fairness; it also observed that the Maltese documents’ perpetual groundrents did not constitute annuities or periodical payments payable for a limited or terminable period under s.43(2)(c).