Terrence William Fraser v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs

Decision date: 15 November 2010

Neutral citation: [2010] UKFTT 569 (TC)

Overall AI summary confidence: medium

AI Notice: Any short overview, ratio decidendi summary or obiter dicta summary shown on this page is AI-generated, provided only to help users assess potential relevance more quickly, and may be wholly inaccurate. No liability is accepted for the accuracy of any such summary, regardless of any AI confidence rating shown. Users should check the underlying decision and obtain appropriate legal advice rather than relying on any summary.

Short overview

This short overview is intended to summarise the case, issues and outcome so far as they are supported by the judgment.

AI confidence in this short overview: medium

This appeal concerned surcharges for late payment of income tax for 1999/2000 and whether the appellant had a reasonable excuse for paying the balancing tax more than six months late. The Tribunal found the appellant had no reasonable excuse at any time during the default period and dismissed the appeal. The Tribunal also held that, even if reliance on incorrect telephone information from HMRC could arguably amount to a reasonable excuse, that excuse would have ended by April 2001 when HMRC sent a statement showing the correct balance.

Ratio decidendi

This summary is intended to identify the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal reasons for deciding and the binding part of the decision.

AI confidence in this ratio decidendi summary: medium

The Tribunal's core holding was that reliance on incomplete HMRC telephone information does not necessarily constitute a reasonable excuse for late tax payment where the taxpayer had prior warning that a balancing payment would be due, and that mere shortage of funds, absent extenuating circumstances, does not amount to a reasonable excuse.

Obiter dicta

This summary is intended to identify obiter dicta, meaning observations made by the way that were not necessary to deciding the case and are not binding.

AI confidence in this obiter dicta summary: medium

The judgment remarked that it may be unreasonable to expect HMRC to provide immediate details of tax owing on a return recently submitted but not yet processed. The Tribunal also noted its procedural use of Rule 5 to extend time for requesting full reasons where an application for permission to appeal was made late.

Warning

The chunk contains substantial repetition of the same passages. notes are somewhat noisy/repetitive but not clearly materially incomplete.

Source links

Judgment page Judgment PDF Judgment XML