Harry Gibson v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs

Decision date: 10 February 2011

Neutral citation: [2011] UKFTT 113 (TC)

Overall AI summary confidence: high

AI Notice: Any short overview, ratio decidendi summary or obiter dicta summary shown on this page is AI-generated, provided only to help users assess potential relevance more quickly, and may be wholly inaccurate. No liability is accepted for the accuracy of any such summary, regardless of any AI confidence rating shown. Users should check the underlying decision and obtain appropriate legal advice rather than relying on any summary.

Short overview

This short overview is intended to summarise the case, issues and outcome so far as they are supported by the judgment.

AI confidence in this short overview: high

This appeal concerned a £100 late-filing penalty imposed on Mr Gibson for a CIS monthly return said by HMRC to have been received after the 19 December due date. The Tribunal accepted Mr Gibson's credible evidence that he posted the return on 15 December and applied the deeming rule in the Interpretation Act 1978 s 7 to treat proper posting as delivery in the ordinary course of post. HMRC produced no evidence to rebut that presumption, so the appeal was allowed and the penalty quashed.

Ratio decidendi

This summary is intended to identify the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal reasons for deciding and the binding part of the decision.

AI confidence in this ratio decidendi summary: high

Where legislation requires submission of a document and posting is an accepted method of compliance, the Interpretation Act 1978 s 7 can operate to deem delivery to have been effected by proper posting unless a contrary intention appears; once a sender proves proper posting, the recipient bears the evidential burden of rebutting the presumption that the document was delivered in the ordinary course of post.

Obiter dicta

This summary is intended to identify obiter dicta, meaning observations made by the way that were not necessary to deciding the case and are not binding.

AI confidence in this obiter dicta summary: medium

The Tribunal took judicial notice that first-class post normally arrives within one to two days and made observations about prior anomalies in HMRC's postal-recording procedures, noting that those past anomalies had on occasions led HMRC to withdraw penalties.

Warning

The chunk contains duplicated and somewhat disordered text, which made extraction of some points repetitive. Notes contain some duplicated and disordered text; they may be incomplete in minor respects.