SilverDoor Limited v The Commissioners for HMRC

Decision date: 28 July 2022

Neutral citation: [2022] UKFTT 233 (TC)

Overall AI summary confidence: high

AI Notice: Any short overview, ratio decidendi summary or obiter dicta summary shown on this page is AI-generated, provided only to help users assess potential relevance more quickly, and may be wholly inaccurate. No liability is accepted for the accuracy of any such summary, regardless of any AI confidence rating shown. Users should check the underlying decision and obtain appropriate legal advice rather than relying on any summary.

Short overview

This short overview is intended to summarise the case, issues and outcome so far as they are supported by the judgment.

AI confidence in this short overview: high

SilverDoor appealed VAT assessments charging VAT on a 2.95% corporate-card fee it charged Clients when booking short-term lettings. The Tribunal found the fee was consideration for SilverDoor's standard-rated reservation services (it acted as disclosed agent for Property Partners) and not an exempt financial service. Alternatively, the Tribunal held SilverDoor did not execute transfers of money nor act as an intermediary bringing parties together for an exempt financial transaction. The appeal was dismissed and the VAT assessments upheld.

Ratio decidendi

This summary is intended to identify the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal reasons for deciding and the binding part of the decision.

AI confidence in this ratio decidendi summary: high

The Tribunal’s ratio is that a charge to recover card-acquirer costs does not convert a supplier’s reservation services into an exempt financial service where the supplier provides the reservation services for consideration, and that a supplier does not effect an exempt “transfer of funds” (or qualify as an intermediary under the exemption) where its acts are merely preparatory or remote to the execution of the payment and it does not execute the transfer or assume responsibility for its execution.

Obiter dicta

This summary is intended to identify obiter dicta, meaning observations made by the way that were not necessary to deciding the case and are not binding.

AI confidence in this obiter dicta summary: medium

The Tribunal observed (obiter) that issuing a payment request or directing a payer to a merchant acquirer, and internal accounting entries recording a payment flow, do not by themselves constitute execution of a transfer of money or negotiation/bringing together sufficient to attract the financial services exemption.