Yisroel Dreyfus v The Commissioners for HMRC

Decision date: 21 March 2024

Neutral citation: [2024] UKFTT 244 (TC)

Overall AI summary confidence: high

AI Notice: Any short overview, ratio decidendi summary or obiter dicta summary shown on this page is AI-generated, provided only to help users assess potential relevance more quickly, and may be wholly inaccurate. No liability is accepted for the accuracy of any such summary, regardless of any AI confidence rating shown. Users should check the underlying decision and obtain appropriate legal advice rather than relying on any summary.

Short overview

This short overview is intended to summarise the case, issues and outcome so far as they are supported by the judgment.

AI confidence in this short overview: high

This appeal concerned whether a former garage/annex at 60a Cranbourne Gardens formed a second dwelling, or was in the process of being constructed or adapted into one, at completion for the purposes of multiple dwellings relief (MDR) on an SDLT return. The Tribunal found the annex was not usable as a separate dwelling at completion and that the limited pre-completion works did not amount to a sufficient physical manifestation or sufficiently advanced adaptation under Schedule 6B paragraph 7(2)(b). The appeal was dismissed and HMRC’s increased assessment therefore stood.

Ratio decidendi

This summary is intended to identify the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal reasons for deciding and the binding part of the decision.

AI confidence in this ratio decidendi summary: high

Paragraph 7(2)(b) requires some physical manifestation of construction or adaptation to have occurred by completion; mere preparatory steps or minimal works undertaken around exchange/completion are insufficient to treat a part of a building as a separate dwelling for MDR. The assessment is objective and evaluative, based on the physical attributes and facilities actually present at completion.

Obiter dicta

This summary is intended to identify obiter dicta, meaning observations made by the way that were not necessary to deciding the case and are not binding.

AI confidence in this obiter dicta summary: medium

The Tribunal indicated that indicators such as separate utility meters, a separate postal address/Council Tax registration, lockable internal access, and adequate kitchen/bathroom fittings are persuasive evidence that a part of a property is suitable for use as a separate dwelling. It also noted that long delays between completion and finishing works, and absence of any letting activity, are relevant when assessing whether adaptation was sufficiently advanced at completion.