A C Tours v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs

Decision date: 5 August 2010

Neutral citation: [2010] UKFTT 363 (TC)

Overall AI summary confidence: high

AI Notice: Any short overview, ratio decidendi summary or obiter dicta summary shown on this page is AI-generated, provided only to help users assess potential relevance more quickly, and may be wholly inaccurate. No liability is accepted for the accuracy of any such summary, regardless of any AI confidence rating shown. Users should check the underlying decision and obtain appropriate legal advice rather than relying on any summary.

Short overview

This short overview is intended to summarise the case, issues and outcome so far as they are supported by the judgment.

AI confidence in this short overview: high

A C Tours appealed HMRC's view that its sales of UK hotel accommodation and tours to foreign tour operators were taxable in the UK. The Tribunal found the provision of promotional and detailed information to clients was ancillary to the principal supply of tours/accommodation, not a separate taxable supply, and therefore the supplies were made in the UK and liable to VAT. The appeal was dismissed.

Ratio decidendi

This summary is intended to identify the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal reasons for deciding and the binding part of the decision.

AI confidence in this ratio decidendi summary: high

Where a composite service has one fundamental element as perceived by the customer and other elements are ancillary and not "an end in itself," the service should be treated as a single supply for VAT purposes; the absence of a separate charge or invoice description for the information supports treating it as ancillary rather than a distinct supply.

Obiter dicta

This summary is intended to identify obiter dicta, meaning observations made by the way that were not necessary to deciding the case and are not binding.

AI confidence in this obiter dicta summary: medium

The Tribunal noted that different factual arrangements—for example a separately offered, contractually distinct tour-planning or information service charged independently of any booking—could lead to a different VAT analysis; it also observed the customer's perspective and commercial reality are relevant in distinguishing principal from ancillary supplies.