Alison Moss v The Commissioners for HMRC

Decision date: 29 May 2025

Neutral citation: [2025] UKFTT 595 (TC)

Overall AI summary confidence: high

AI Notice: Any short overview, ratio decidendi summary or obiter dicta summary shown on this page is AI-generated, provided only to help users assess potential relevance more quickly, and may be wholly inaccurate. No liability is accepted for the accuracy of any such summary, regardless of any AI confidence rating shown. Users should check the underlying decision and obtain appropriate legal advice rather than relying on any summary.

Short overview

This short overview is intended to summarise the case, issues and outcome so far as they are supported by the judgment.

AI confidence in this short overview: high

This appeal concerned discovery assessments issued by HMRC for unreported Airbnb rental income from a jointly owned property let 2017–2020 and claims for deduction of solar-panel loan repayments. The tribunal found the discovery assessments valid, held the appellant alone carried on the rental business and was solely taxable on the profits (rejecting that the former husband was beneficially entitled to half), and disallowed the solar‑panel loan repayments as deductions. The appeal was dismissed.

Ratio decidendi

This summary is intended to identify the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal reasons for deciding and the binding part of the decision.

AI confidence in this ratio decidendi summary: high

Where spouses are not treated as living together, the presumption of equal beneficial entitlement to rental income does not apply; tax liability follows receipt or entitlement to the rental profits, and merely benefiting from application of income to joint debts does not establish beneficial entitlement by the other spouse.

Obiter dicta

This summary is intended to identify obiter dicta, meaning observations made by the way that were not necessary to deciding the case and are not binding.

AI confidence in this obiter dicta summary: medium

A power of attorney to deal with property does not, by itself, show that the donor participated in or was entitled to profits of a rental business; benefiting from income (for example through debt repayments) is distinct from being in receipt of or entitled to income for tax purposes.