Mark Alan Smith v The Commissioners for HMRC

Decision date: 30 October 2023

Neutral citation: [2023] UKFTT 912 (TC)

Overall AI summary confidence: high

AI Notice: Any short overview, ratio decidendi summary or obiter dicta summary shown on this page is AI-generated, provided only to help users assess potential relevance more quickly, and may be wholly inaccurate. No liability is accepted for the accuracy of any such summary, regardless of any AI confidence rating shown. Users should check the underlying decision and obtain appropriate legal advice rather than relying on any summary.

Short overview

This short overview is intended to summarise the case, issues and outcome so far as they are supported by the judgment.

AI confidence in this short overview: high

This appeal concerned discovery assessments issued by HMRC for 2012/13 alleging SIFA had distributed goodwill to the appellants by crediting goodwill in Simpsons Wealth Management LLP capital accounts. The tribunal found on the facts that the relevant client relationships and reputation belonged to the individual advisers, not to SIFA, and that SIFA’s accounts (prepared in accordance with GAAP) did not show omitted goodwill; accordingly there was no company distribution and the appeals succeeded.

Ratio decidendi

This summary is intended to identify the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal reasons for deciding and the binding part of the decision.

AI confidence in this ratio decidendi summary: medium

Where company accounts prepared in accordance with GAAP show no asset for particular goodwill over the relevant years, it is not reasonable on those facts to infer that substantial omitted goodwill existed and was distributed; and personal client relationships/reputation may, depending on factual ownership, constitute advisers’ individual assets rather than assets of their employing company, so a transfer of those relationships does not necessarily amount to a company distribution.

Obiter dicta

This summary is intended to identify obiter dicta, meaning observations made by the way that were not necessary to deciding the case and are not binding.

AI confidence in this obiter dicta summary: medium

The tribunal commented (not essential to the disposal) that goodwill is associated with a business but need not always vest in the carrying entity; ownership of goodwill is factual and context-dependent, and there is a distinction between personal client relationships akin to a right to trade and broader reputational goodwill capable of being an asset.