Next Generation Clubs Limited v The Commissioners for HMRC

Decision date: 29 June 2026

Neutral citation: [2026] UKFTT 976 (TC)

Overall AI summary confidence: high

AI Notice: Any short overview, ratio decidendi summary or obiter dicta summary shown on this page is AI-generated, provided only to help users assess potential relevance more quickly, and may be wholly inaccurate. No liability is accepted for the accuracy of any such summary, regardless of any AI confidence rating shown. Users should check the underlying decision and obtain appropriate legal advice rather than relying on any summary.

Short overview

This short overview is intended to summarise the case, issues and outcome so far as they are supported by the judgment.

AI confidence in this short overview: high

The Tribunal considered whether multi-facility leisure-club memberships (David Lloyd Clubs) fell within Group 16 of Schedule 7A (the TRR) as "rights of admission to ... similar cultural events and facilities." After detailed factual findings the Tribunal held the supplies were not similar to any specific item in Group 16 nor to the list as a whole, and that the memberships were rights of access (regular use) rather than rights of admission; the appeal was dismissed.

Ratio decidendi

This summary is intended to identify the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal reasons for deciding and the binding part of the decision.

AI confidence in this ratio decidendi summary: high

When testing whether a supply falls within Group 16 similarity must be assessed first against specific listed items and, if not similar, against the common characteristics of the list as a whole. Relevant common characteristics include a main attraction that is the primary draw, an extraordinary (not ordinary day-to-day) experience for the average consumer, and public access by payment of admission; a multi-component membership intended for regular, everyday use ("third space") will typically not meet that test.

Obiter dicta

This summary is intended to identify obiter dicta, meaning observations made by the way that were not necessary to deciding the case and are not binding.

AI confidence in this obiter dicta summary: medium

The Tribunal observed (obiter) that fiscal neutrality considerations may inform how "similarity" is understood but cannot be used to expand the statutory list beyond its words; limited photographic evidence of landscaping is insufficient to characterise a site as an "amusement park" and ongoing capacity-based membership restrictions distinguish closed clubs from publicly accessible attractions.