David Williams v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs

Decision date: 15 October 2010

Neutral citation: [2010] UKFTT 508 (TC)

Overall AI summary confidence: medium

AI Notice: Any short overview, ratio decidendi summary or obiter dicta summary shown on this page is AI-generated, provided only to help users assess potential relevance more quickly, and may be wholly inaccurate. No liability is accepted for the accuracy of any such summary, regardless of any AI confidence rating shown. Users should check the underlying decision and obtain appropriate legal advice rather than relying on any summary.

Short overview

This short overview is intended to summarise the case, issues and outcome so far as they are supported by the judgment.

AI confidence in this short overview: medium

This appeal challenged HMRC’s withdrawal of the appellant’s Construction Industry Scheme gross payment status after two instalment payments were made late. The tribunal found the 32‑ and 67‑day delays were outside the 14‑day grace in regulation 32, that the appellant had no reasonable excuse given available overdraft facilities, and that HMRC lawfully and not unfairly exercised its discretion under section 66(1). The appeal was dismissed.

Ratio decidendi

This summary is intended to identify the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal reasons for deciding and the binding part of the decision.

AI confidence in this ratio decidendi summary: medium

From the tribunal’s findings: section 66(1) gives HMRC a discretion to cancel gross payment registration (it is not mandatory to cancel in every breach), regulation 32’s 14‑day tolerance does not save payments made more than 14 days late, and a taxpayer’s claim of a "reasonable excuse" under the Taxes Management Act can be undermined by evidence that payment could reasonably have been made (here, available overdraft facilities).

Obiter dicta

This summary is intended to identify obiter dicta, meaning observations made by the way that were not necessary to deciding the case and are not binding.

AI confidence in this obiter dicta summary: high

The tribunal noted procedural points: a party absent from the hearing may apply to set aside the decision under Rule 38, and permission to appeal under Rule 39 must be sought within 56 days. The comment that HMRC’s exercise of discretion showed no sign of unfairness was expressed as a factual observation rather than a general legal principle.

Warning

Chunk contains repeated text and formatting noise; findings drawn only from material present. notes contain repeated text and formatting noise; findings are limited to the judgment.

Source links

Judgment page Judgment PDF Judgment XML