Ezy Solutions Ltd (In Liquidation) Milo Corporation Ltd (In Liquidation) v His Majesty's Revenue & Customs

Decision date: 9 March 2023

Neutral citation: Neutral citation not available

Overall AI summary confidence: high

AI Notice: Any short overview, ratio decidendi summary or obiter dicta summary shown on this page is AI-generated, provided only to help users assess potential relevance more quickly, and may be wholly inaccurate. No liability is accepted for the accuracy of any such summary, regardless of any AI confidence rating shown. Users should check the underlying decision and obtain appropriate legal advice rather than relying on any summary.

Short overview

This short overview is intended to summarise the case, issues and outcome so far as they are supported by the judgment.

AI confidence in this short overview: high

This case concerned HMRC's application to prove circa £50m of VAT loss by reliance on a MUC schedule and sampling 50 underlying transactions without having served the underlying documents to the appellants. The Tribunal refused the sampling application as premature, concluding the appellants must first be provided the underlying evidence so they can judge representativeness and meet the case against them. The Tribunal granted limited permission to amend grounds to plead assessments were not to best judgment unless HMRC objected within seven days, and directed parties to agree further directions.

Ratio decidendi

This summary is intended to identify the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal reasons for deciding and the binding part of the decision.

AI confidence in this ratio decidendi summary: high

Sampling as a case-management tool is only appropriate where the party against whom sampling is to be used has been given sufficient underlying evidence to assess whether any sample would be representative; withholding the underlying evidence makes sampling unfair or premature and a party must know the case against it before sampling proceeds.

Obiter dicta

This summary is intended to identify obiter dicta, meaning observations made by the way that were not necessary to deciding the case and are not binding.

AI confidence in this obiter dicta summary: medium

The judgment noted authorities supporting sampling (including Megantic and an unreported decision of Judge Berner) may assist where evidence has been disclosed but are of limited assistance where disclosure is absent; and that the volume of evidence alone does not justify withholding disclosure.