John Beesley & Anor v The Commissioners for HMRC

Decision date: 25 July 2023

Neutral citation: [2023] UKFTT 650 (TC)

Overall AI summary confidence: high

AI Notice: Any short overview, ratio decidendi summary or obiter dicta summary shown on this page is AI-generated, provided only to help users assess potential relevance more quickly, and may be wholly inaccurate. No liability is accepted for the accuracy of any such summary, regardless of any AI confidence rating shown. Users should check the underlying decision and obtain appropriate legal advice rather than relying on any summary.

Short overview

This short overview is intended to summarise the case, issues and outcome so far as they are supported by the judgment.

AI confidence in this short overview: high

HMRC issued discovery assessments for the appellants' 2015/16 tax year and imposed penalties; the appellants (via an agent) sought large CGT deductions for mortgage redemption and a personal guarantee payment which HMRC rejected. The First-tier Tribunal held the discovery assessments were valid and timely, disallowed the claimed deductions (mortgage redemption not allowable under s38 TCGA; guarantee payment did not give rise to an allowable loss in 2015/16 and could not be carried back), and upheld penalties for careless behaviour (reduced on review). The appeal was dismissed.

Ratio decidendi

This summary is intended to identify the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal reasons for deciding and the binding part of the decision.

AI confidence in this ratio decidendi summary: high

Allowable deductions on a disposal for CGT are limited to those specified in s38 TCGA (purchase price, incidental acquisition/disposal costs and qualifying enhancement expenditure); payments under personal guarantees give rise to relief under s253 TCGA only where there is a qualifying loan and the payment is made, the loss arising in the year of payment and cannot be carried back; discovery assessments within the statutory time limits are competent even where taxpayers or their agents have not provided full returns.

Obiter dicta

This summary is intended to identify obiter dicta, meaning observations made by the way that were not necessary to deciding the case and are not binding.

AI confidence in this obiter dicta summary: medium

The Tribunal noted that reliance on an agent's incorrect understanding of CGT does not constitute a reasonable excuse and adviser incompetence will not generally excuse taxpayers from tax consequences; late professional advice post-dating the tax year is irrelevant to the year in which relief is claimed.