The Jerk Yard Limited v The Commissioners for HMRC

Decision date: 30 January 2025

Neutral citation: [2025] UKFTT 94 (TC)

Overall AI summary confidence: high

AI Notice: Any short overview, ratio decidendi summary or obiter dicta summary shown on this page is AI-generated, provided only to help users assess potential relevance more quickly, and may be wholly inaccurate. No liability is accepted for the accuracy of any such summary, regardless of any AI confidence rating shown. Users should check the underlying decision and obtain appropriate legal advice rather than relying on any summary.

Short overview

This short overview is intended to summarise the case, issues and outcome so far as they are supported by the judgment.

AI confidence in this short overview: high

The Jerk Yard Limited appealed a £424.98 Schedule 26 VAT penalty for late payment of the 07/23 VAT return. The Tribunal found the penalty was properly assessed and notified, rejected the appellant’s claim of a reasonable excuse (including delay in registration/repayment processing), and, despite finding HMRC’s explanation on special circumstances procedurally flawed, concluded there were no special circumstances warranting any reduction. The appeal was dismissed and the penalty stands.

Ratio decidendi

This summary is intended to identify the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal reasons for deciding and the binding part of the decision.

AI confidence in this ratio decidendi summary: medium

The Tribunal held that delay by HMRC in processing registration or repayment does not, without more, amount to a reasonable excuse for late VAT payment where the taxpayer could have taken earlier steps to prepare returns or seek a time-to-pay arrangement; procedural inadequacy in HMRC’s reasoning about special circumstances does not itself require quashing or reduction of a penalty absent persuasive special circumstances.

Obiter dicta

This summary is intended to identify obiter dicta, meaning observations made by the way that were not necessary to deciding the case and are not binding.

AI confidence in this obiter dicta summary: medium

The Tribunal observed that taxpayers should not rely on anticipated HMRC repayments to meet contemporaneous tax liabilities and are expected to make contingency plans or apply for time-to-pay arrangements; it also noted that HMRC’s failure to process claims expeditiously can be the subject of judicial review, but such failures do not automatically entitle a taxpayer to Schedule 26 relief.